Category Archives: Critical Thinking

Violence and Conflict: Thinking of the children

Violence and Conflict

From our earliest days, humans have had to live a life of violence and conflict. Whether we were hunting for food, defending a tribe or village, or marching to war, violence and conflict were there. We are, as a species, adaptable and violent. And we always have been.

In our modern world, conflict comes in many different varieties. Sometimes we argue with words, or through digital devices we send hateful messages that we would be frightened to speak aloud in the presence of the person we wish to chastise. Violence and conflict are found in the person yelling at and demeaning their spouse, in the cyber bully who taunts a child ever closer to suicide, and the drunken Uncle who starts smacking his nephew
Continue reading

Leave a Comment

Filed under Critical Thinking, Self Defense, Self Protection, Uncategorized

On Instructors and Pseudo-masters

For the beginner student in martial arts, it can be extremely difficult to tell the real from the fake when meeting the people who teach martial arts classes.

In this essay, I am going to give you some tools that will help you to determine if the person teaching the class is a real instructor, or if the instructor is one of the numerous frauds out there who pass themselves off as instructors, when they are nothing more than charlatans masquerading as instructors.

I got a ton of email after the release of Slapping Dragons from people wanting to know if everything in the first chapter was something that someone I know had done. The answer was simple, I had not personally met every person claiming these things, however, I had met many who had, and many more who passed on such stories in complete seriousness.

It should be obvious, but some things do need to be said out loud (or in this case, spelled out). If your instructor stares at the sun, uses lines that came out of the Kung Fu TV series, beats himself with kali sticks and nunchucks, drills holes in his body and claims to have been shot, says he can walk on fire and water, hold a horse stance for days on end, and so on…you kinda need to use your head and think a little bit about what you are buying.

Before we continue, I do need to make a point. When we speak of martial artists, we need to keep in mind that the terms “normal” and “martial arts lifer” are not always able to exist side by side. To a one, the martial arts lifers I have known, and including me, were not really normal people. I have actually heard myself tell another person, “I can’t really go so far as to say I like pain, but I don’t mind it as much as other people seem to mind it.” When I said it, it sounded deep, and I was as serious as I have ever been. I was not trying to be macho, or impress a girl; I was just sharing something I thought was profound. I have known a good many people who were the same. A person who trains in the martial arts for an extended period (longer than five years) is going to be someone who deals with pain pretty regularly, probably has chronic injuries, has lost a lot of meaningful relationships, and spent absurd amounts of time alone. We all cope in different ways. I have known those who turned to alcohol and drugs, but the majority I knew took pride in their pain. War Stories was a term that came into common use as some of the old dogs would sit around and discuss why their hips were gone, or how they lost their knees. Later still when I took a job as a bouncer, war stories took on even more meaning. But the stories, and the oohs and ahhs were in a very strange way healing. I bring this up to illustrate the fact that just because an instructor seems like a weirdo does not mean he is a fraud. Most lifers are what Robert Thomas used to call “throwed off”.

We are just different.

The legitimate martial arts instructor is going to be someone who has a verifiable background. Certificates do not mean as much as they once did, as there are now many organizations who give certification in anything for a fee. There are also people who issue certificates for nothing more than you paying to attend their seminar.

Claims of training under a well-known master are also suspect, as there are many well-known masters who certify for a fee. Verifiable means that there should be someone who was working toward black belt at the same time as the instructor in question who is around at least sometimes. The instructor’s instructor should be verifiable as well. Life being what it is (something that stops), there is the possibility that your instructor’s instructor is dead. But even then there should still be someone coming around who “knew him back when…”

In addition to having a background, the instructor who is legitimate should have a deep knowledge of the style he or she is teaching.

How exactly could someone ever become an instructor in any style of martial arts without a deep knowledge of the style?

There are some things to look out for as indicators that the instructor is a pseudo-master.

A Pseudo-master claims that the mainstream martial arts community is against him.

Very often the pseudo-masters make the claim that they are legitimate because the mainstream martial arts do not follow his teachings. This is asinine reasoning and needs to be recognized for what it is; an excuse.

The fact is that the mainstream martial arts community willingly embraces anything that is better than what they are currently doing. Look, just for one example, at the tremendous popularity of MMA. Here is something very different from what mainstream martial arts were doing, and yet when it proved in practice to be superior to what the rest of us were doing, it was embraced. Many traditionalists, rather than claiming that MMA was out to get them, jumped in and found every way that MMA could add to what they had in their style.

A martial artist who is legitimate is going to be secure, and a secure martial artist is going to be open to new ideas if they can further his understanding, training, or skill.

A pseudo-master is going to force you to do things they cannot do.

If you have a test requirement of 100 pushups, the instructor should be able to do 100 pushups. I always found it odd when an instructor had required jumping techniques that they could not do.

If they ask you to do a mile of front kicks, they should be there at your side doing them with you, not sitting in the shade drinking a beer while you go it alone.

A Pseudo-master is going to make claims that are simply not physically possible.

Pseudo-masters love the old kung fu movies a little too much. I love old Shaw Brothers classics, as much as anyone ever has. Loving old kung fu theater shows is not an indicator of pseudo-mastery, but claiming such abilities and powers as are found in these movies is a very real red flag. Much of what they claim to be able to do comes from these movies. When you hear someone claiming to be able to levitate, kill with and sometimes without a touch, endure pain without ever showing it, break things that are not really breakable, claim the ability to mentally feel your body and tell where you are tense or where you need to work, and so on, you are in the presence of an a pseudo-master.

Just for fun; remove the above claims from a setting located within a martial arts school. Imagine a dinner party at the Mayor’s house. Now picture Grand Master Autumnbottom saying the same things.

Is what he is saying going to be treated with respect?

Further still, are the people around him going to allow him to say these stupid things and not call him on it (out of respect for his esteemed powers)?

Absolutely not! Someone there will say, “BS!”

So why is this allowed within the martial arts school (which really is a place of business)?

It is tolerated because of the strange habit we have in the martial arts of setting aside our better judgment in favor of allowing yet another doofus tell their lies to us.

It is tolerated because we follow outdated practices of allowing anyone who is a higher rank to claim anything they want without being called out on it because they outrank us.

I remember being told as the Executive Director of a martial arts group I was a part of was coming in to do a seminar, “Don’t stand close to him, because he will sweep you if you get close. He doesn’t let anyone get close to him.”

Yeah, thanks for the advice, but I only ended up getting curious-er and curious-er.

So an astounding seven times during his visit, I got close enough to pat him on the butt (I didn’t, but I was close enough to do so if I had any urge whatsoever to touch the butt of a sixty-seven year old pseudo-master).

At the dinner after the seminar, someone reminded him of sweeping people who got too close. He boasted that he never let anyone get closer than five feet to him. As people were milling around after the dinner, I had to try one last time to receive a sweep from a master. I got close. And then I got closer. And I got closer still. He still didn’t sweep, so I wrapped my arm around his shoulder in a manly hug. Down he went! I was excited! I was finally going to get knocked down by a master. There was a loud cracking sound as shinbone hit shinbone (yes I turned as he went down, but only because I wanted to see the sweep).

But I didn’t fall.

In Judo, those who throw the best leave you with a feeling that you did not move, but rather that the earth flew up and hit you.

That didn’t happen either.

Bone on bone.

It hurt like crazy but he got the worst of it, and told me as tears welled up in his eyes that I needed to leave. I was feeling considerable pain as well, but it was clear he got the worst of the contact. It was an odd sweep too. Most of the sweeps I have been taught use the back of the leg to do the dirty work, but none of that matters.

Place this incident back at the Mayor’s party and see if it seems like it would be well received.

Now ask yourself if the person who was the recipient of the failed sweep would be the one who was frowned on by all at the event.

Who would be the one treated with scorn and ridicule by those who knew him, and ultimately asked to leave the school?

Lastly, ask yourself if this kind of deference to fraudulent claims does any service whatsoever for the martial arts in general, or an organization specifically.

A Pseudo-master will try to use science-ey sounding terms to lend credibility to his claims.

Put simply, science is science. The terms used in science have strictly defined meanings. Pseudo-masters make a huge mistake when they borrow terms from science to describe their BS martial arts mumbo-jumbo.

Take the simple term energy. It is a nice word, tidy, clean, and sounds important. When a pseudo-master gets ahold of it, they just use it to explain what they do not have an explanation for. “Qi is energy” and “Qi is the underlying and animating energy of the universe” are two claims I wish would die a public death. In science, energy is not an unquantifiable abstract; it is a thing. It is measurable, traceable, predictable, and so on.

When martial artists began to define Qi as energy, science was right there to lend a hand.

Only they could not find any qi.

When you hear terms that sound like science being used to explain super powers in the martial arts, you need to start the process of critical thinking.

Or just leave.

I would leave.

A Pseudo-master will never get past the point of trying to sell you on what they are teaching.

I have said it before, but this really does seem to need to be repeated:

A legitimate martial arts instructor is going to be a secure person.

They will note that you have signed on to their school and are training with them, and they will no longer see the point in trying to sell you on the teachings, and instead they will focus on the transmission of knowledge and skill.

A pseudo-master will be the opposite. While they may try very hard to appear secure, they will show their insecurity in the fact that the sale never seems to be final to them. They play a constant game of “See?!?! This stuff is real!! Did you see that? Did you see what I did? It was awesome wasn’t it? I’m awesome…right?! Please tell me I’m awesome. And you! You really made the right choice in training here! You know that right? This style is real! The other styles out there are inferior. You can see that. Right? Please like me.”

This insecurity is unbecoming a true expert, but again, the pseudo-master is a fraud, and so they will never truly feel secure in your commitment to the style or school. They will also never really be confident enough to just let it go and teach. Even the lessons will tend to still feel like a sales pitch.

Be wary whenever you spot this behavior.

A Pseudo-master claims direct lineage from the grand master (or some such) of a style or system.

This goes back to security. I know a good many martial arts instructors who boast of their superior lineage, and actually did train under the people they claim. But the boasting itself is a sign of insecurity. To these people, I can only say to get the confidence to stand on your own. If your lineage is legitimate, great! Just don’t bring it up over and over. It makes you seem like less yourself and more about who you trained under.

The pseudo-master cannot help it though. It is the master’s name who (at least to the pseudo-master) will give him some much needed credibility.

Rather than giving any credence to the person the instructor trained under, you would be wiser to watch the instructor. Are they knowledgeable? Do they have a coherent teaching methodology? If they have this, you can relax a little bit, and just assume that the instructor has a lineage focus. You do not have to follow the importance-of-lineage teachings, and you can still learn the style. If they do not have this, begin the critical thinking process and determine before you spend any money whether or not you are in the presence of a fraud. Look also at the students of the instructor in question. Do they show skill, independent thought, and enjoyment? These are good things to see. If these clues are absent, then serious thought needs to be made prior to signing anything.

Pseudo-masters tend to have out of the ordinary uniforms.

This part is so silly that I almost left it out, but it should be a red flag, and so I kept it.

Almost as if by plan, the vast majority of the frauds in the martial arts have weird uniforms. And even worse than this, they also tend to dress like a person from a bad science fiction movie or an old kung fu movie when they are not in the training hall.

My take on this is that the frauds are completely insecure, and need to feel at all times as if every single person in the room knows that they are the master.

Legitimate martial artists are very secure people.

Remember at the beginning, I pointed out how martial arts lifers are not always normal people? Well, to a one, the martial arts lifers that I have known were very secure, even when people pointed out that they were different from normal people.

The pseudo-masters never feel secure because they are not being themselves. They know they are lying at every moment and have to be on constant guard against getting caught in the lie.

Many pseudo-masters are teaching a style that they claim to have invented, or has an unbelievably ancient and untraceable origin.

There are only a limited number of ways to hit and kick a person. The structure of the human body places a limit on the number of ways this can be done effectively. This applies to wrestling as well. This limit, and the number of years we have had people absorbed in the study of how to take another person apart places these limits and throw a dark shadow of doubt upon the claims of the pseudo-masters and the plethora of styles these knuckleheads have “invented”.

There are modern styles. Jeet Kune Do is a modern style. MMA is modern, but does not like to be categorized with the traditional martial arts, even though they are more traditional than they like to admit. However, there is really little need to re-invent the wheel. Jeet Kune Do was an application of the concepts of fencing and western boxing to martial arts, and MMA is simply the reintegration of grappling training with the standard striking arts. When MMA started to come into its own, you didn’t see the style suddenly claim to be ten thousand years old, or come from a temple. It simply developed in front of everyone who cared to watch, and became a very popular sport, supplanting everything and finding its way to mainstream acceptance.

Pseudo-masters claim magical abilities.

I really wish there were magical powers to be found in the martial arts. Truly I do. They are just not there.

Pseudo-masters claim these abilities. The claims range from the silly to the absurd. I have heard of a master who can walk on snow and leave no footprints. It is silly, but the claim was made.

I was told of a master who can thump you on the head and produce a stream of tears from only one eye. Why only one? Why not both eyes. At least this would have made the claim a tiny bit more believable.

I was also told of a master who had the ability to produce an electric shock in your body by stroking your armpit. Why armpit and why electric shock? Even if I had this ability, I could not use it because I have no wish to touch another person’s armpit. Ewww.

I also heard a story about a master who could strike you (in some variations he would simply shout) and cause you to start bouncing. You would be unable to stop bouncing until he un-did whatever it was that he did. This reaches a level of absurdity that even Hollywood has passed on.

I was also met a master who claimed he had the ability to make your nose bleed by stroking one of your buttocks. (No, I am not making this up…). Although he was unable to replicate the effect on me, he did get to feel my buttock by making the claim, and he may have enjoyed that. He then tried to explain it away that my skills (or was it my buttock) were too strong for the effect to occur.

There are many masters who claim they could kill animals with a light touch to certain acupuncture points (this one is very widespread and extends to the “touch-of-death” claims which are still widely popular today).

I was told of a master who could shout and cause the fish in a lake or river to become unconscious and float to the surface where they could be scooped up with a net. When I was in the Philippines, I chanced to see some kids in a river with nets, and their Father was up stream tossing lit sticks of dynamite into the river to produce much the same effect with less training, so this skill seems unneeded.

I cannot count how many times I have been told of masters who could climb a wall like a lizard. What this is supposed to pass on to the person forced to listen to such nonsense is beyond me. This falls into the same category as the tales of masters who could levitate. It just seems like unnecessary nonsense to repeat such foolish idiocy.

This, of course, pales in comparison to the tales of masters who were able to defeat 20 or more armed attackers, while they themselves were unarmed (except for the awesome powers of Chinese kung fu!). Outnumbered is outnumbered. When you are alone against more than one person, the odds say you will lose. Even with a simple two-on-one situation, your skill level and conditioning would have to severely outshine your two opponents for you to even stand a ghost of a chance of winning.

I have also been in the presence of people who claimed that they could be sliced open and not bleed. This is BS beyond all necessity. People bleed when cut, end of story. Why would anyone see a need to claim to be exempt from this rule? These same people also said they could seal a wound with their mind, and heal broken bones in minutes through herbs and massage.

Really?

I don’t know how many people have claimed the ability to extinguish a candle flame by staring at it intently (I would just blow it out…). This is a senseless power that really serves no purpose, even if it did exist.

I really love it when I run into masters who say they can read your mind. I ask them to read mine and sit there repeatedly thinking “Purple monkey dishwasher!”

One master I met claimed the ability to travel in another dimension. He claimed the ability shorted his life, so he refused to do it, “unless the world was in danger”. Nice way to not get tested.

Many masters claim the ability to knock you out without touching you in any way. While I have written about this extensively in the past, I will just make a quick note here that common sense must prevail. There is no way for a person to knock you out without contact. If you think that there is, then follow these pseudo-masters and let them take your money. I’m not the type to say “I told you so”, unless, of course, I really did tell you so.

Pseudo-masters tend to have unusual titles and demand to be bowed to even in settings outside of the dojo, and need your opinion to be set aside in favor of their own no matter the social setting.

Again this falls back on the insecurities of the person in question. I have trained in martial arts for thirty years and do not demand to be bowed to in any setting outside of the training hall. Even within the training hall I do not demand it. There are parts of the traditional martial arts class where a bow is performed, and I perform it at the same time as my students. It is not them showing respect to me while I receive it, it is mutual. And that is as it should be. I respect my students for putting up with me, and they respect me for putting up with them.

I knew an unbearable person who demanded inside the dojo rituals even when the setting was as casual as a restaurant. I felt absurd each time he would show up and we were all expected to stand up and bow to him in the restaurant. In front of people. Who were staring. And laughing. And pointing. I hate when people point and stare and laugh. But this guy had us go through the wonderful experience every single time he came around.

This is what happens when a Beta is trying to be an Alpha. They need the constant reassurance and demand approval and praise and recognition. A real Alpha looks at praise and applause as fit for stage actors and dancing monkeys.

The Pseudo-masters also have a strange habit of demanding that there be no dissenting opinion in their presence. Once again, this cries out Beta behavior, as the Alpha are very secure people. When you know you are right, you just know you are right, and see no need to disallow any dissenting opinion from being voiced. Dissent leads to the Alpha needing to provide proof, once proof is given, the status of the Alpha is strengthened, and so he sees no bad side to this.

And a word on the titles. Where should I begin? Let me speak from a perspective of the Chinese Martial Arts as it is what I know best.

Once upon a time there were instructors and students. The Instructor was called Sifu. The term Sifu is often translated as meaning “Father-Teacher” but really just signifies a male teacher. There are some Sifu who may end up acting fatherly, or having students who look at them as a second father, but such instances are probably rare.

So the goal of a good many student was to become a Sifu. In a lot of cases these students made it through to the successful completion of this goal while continuing to train with their instructor, but some gave up training, left the school early, started their own and declared themselves to be Sifu.

This new generation of Sifu, legitimate and not, opened up martial arts schools and began teaching. As the illegitimate instructors had less actual material to teach, students progressed faster, and would grow frustrated when their instructor ran out of material. Some took the same path as their teach, while others allowed the poorly trained instructor to confer the status of Sifu upon them. But with his need to be higher than the students, this Sifu needed a new title. He could not get the respect he felt he deserved if he were called Sifu and his students were Sifu as well. So we end up with Grandmaster, Great grandmaster, and a fellow in the Upper Midwest who declared himself to be “Grandmaster of Grandmasters”.

There are also the pseudo-masters who declare themselves to be Professors, and ask to be called Doctor.

This is asinine and completely unnecessary.

It only takes a little bit of self-confidence to see that a black belt who has black belt students is still a black belt. Promoting students in no way diminishes the instructor.

Provided he is a secure person. And there lies the real issue.

Comments Off

Filed under Critical Thinking, Slapping Dragons

Beware the Self-Defense Expert

I want to set some information out there, and while there are a few who will agree, and some who will rightfully express that this is something they have been saying for years, the information needs to be spread far and wide.

Misinformation abounds in the self defense industry. This is due mostly to self-appointed experts, and generations of people teaching what they had been taught without scrutiny and a mind for critical thinking. There is also the fact that violence is not really understood by very many people in the martial arts world, but there is some extra money to be made if you promote and teach garbage self-defense classes.

Real violence is ugly. The “attacker” who steps and grabs you by the wrist is not out there. They guy who steps up behind you, sucker punches you into unconsciousness and robs your motionless body is out there.

As the subject is huge, and very important, I am going to approach it from several angles, and hope something sticks in the mind of the beginner, and seems important enough to be passed on by the seasoned instructor.

For a start I am going to remind you of a quote I first hear attributed to Josh Billings,

It ain’t what a man don’t know that makes him a fool, its what he does know that ain’t so.

Take for example the common claim that high kicks are not effective.

20121121_193359

I have knocked people out with head kicks in sparring, tournaments and even in physical conflicts. They do work. The issue is speed and timing, as well as minimizing the telegraph of your intent. In the photo above, my longtime student Jeff is attempting a kick to my knee. What was the situation? Was he trying to kick my knee and I responded by trying to kick his head? If so the kick to the head would likely arrive to late, if at all. Did I initiate my kick first and he attempted a shorter route kick to the knee as a counter-attack? If so, my chances for success rise dramatically. Also note the pivot of the base foot, so often taught as a balance aid, also minimizes the knee damage I take in the event his kick gets to me before the knock out.

Are head kicks the best technique for self-defense? Absolutely not!

The problem with discussing self-defense is that there is so much that people think they understand, have heard and taken as Gospel truth.

Here is a fact that must be understood at the deepest levels before you listen to anyone on the subject –

Violence and Self-Defense are subjects so big that no one person has all of the answers.

20121121_193424

The knee-jerk reaction to the first photo is the line about “low kicks are what you need.”

Low kicks arrive at the target faster, and in many cases will end the fight. But in the world of self defense, nothing is 100%.

Nothing.

As soon as you think you have all of the answers, you are in trouble. When you know everything, some teen with a gun can take you completely out of your element and remove all of your confidence and skills from the equation by simply changing the question.

Violence is ugly. It is not the antiseptic version you find taught in most dojo around the world. A guy steps out of a shadow and caves your skull in with a baseball bat. A guy steps up behind you and opens your throat before you knew the guy or the knife even existed. A guy asks for directions and as you look to point out the right way he sucker-punches you into total confusion or unconsciousness.

The fact is so simple that most people miss it.

The physical techniques are what you need after you have done everything else wrong. Do not focus on the last resort! Focus on what is important.

Awareness

You need to be aware of your surroundings. You need to be aware when someone is staring at you. You need to be unafraid and see what is going on, but above all, you need to be here right now.

I love technology as much, if not more than most of the people I know, but there are things I see that baffle me. I have almost run over three people in the last two weeks who were more interested in their phone than paying attention to the cars driving near them. If I ever were to become a criminal, I know that the easiest victims would be those people absorbed in their tech devices. And if I know this, the criminal knows it even better because it is how they find resources, to me it is just speculation. You have to be able to tell if the situation is a monkey dance (social violence: hierarchal dominance) or the human predator (falls in the category of the very scary asocial violence). You have to know when you are in a situation where your normal is not normal here.

It is a huge subject, and it is not going to be fully understood in five easy lessons, or a two hour seminar. If you are interested in being safe, there are some people out there who know the subject and are teaching the truth. If they start with and get stuck on the physical, then you are wasting your  time and need to move on.

For a final word in this essay; be careful in who you trust. There are many people who claim to know the subject of violence inside and out, but have never been in a real conflict in their entire life. Sparring is not fighting and the Dojo is not the street. Remember, the physical is what you need after you have done everything else wrong. Learn first how to do the initial stuff right. Awareness and avoidance, de-escalation and recognition. These are more important by far than what to do if Johnny Badguy grabs your wrist.

Comments Off

Filed under Critical Thinking, Self Defense, Self Protection

A Blending of Styles

I received a comment to a post made a few days ago. Naturally, as comments on the posts are so rare, this was a bit of a thrill for me. When I read the comment, I started a reply, that got longer and longer, until, I thought (and quite possibly said out loud…to myself), “This is turning into a blog post.” I am including the comment here, and my reply will follow:

“Hi. I’ve been training Krav Maga for a several months now. I’m looking for another MA to add to it. I’ve several ideas but I’m not looking to train like for the UFC. I’m trying to get solid self defence and also add something with some style and other skills that will also complement Krav. What are your thoughts on mixing martial arts. What are the good and bad to look out for? Again, I’m not trying to get into the Thai Boxing/Jujitsu thing. I’ve considered Judo, but I also like Chinese Martial arts.”

First off, I would like to thank you for reading, enjoying as well as commenting on my blog. It does feel good when my friends drop in, but I also enjoy the feeling that people I have never met are reading my writing and getting something out of it. Before I start, I want to say that there are several topics that I am going to address in this reply to your comment, and in no way do I intend any of it to e taken as any form of attack or insult. I feel a need to say it here, as in a medium such as the written word, there is a total lack of speech inflection to allow for understanding of something that may not be spoken in too much detail. In short, don’t read between the lines, and if anything seems cross, just let me know and I will be happy to clarify.

You asked about my thoughts on mixing martial arts.

As a Traditional Martial Arts practitioner, I have a near instant reaction to say, “No! It is a baaaaaaaaaaaad idea!”

But in the back of my mind, I can hear many of my close friends pointing out to me that

A. I have studied in several different styles.

B. I am a huge fan of MMA

Yes, guilty as charged on both counts. But I do not mix them. I have never blended martial arts, just as I wouldn’t take a fine single malt and mix it with cola. It simply is not done.

Regarding the MMA mention, I have to say that in my eyes, MMA, in spite of its protestations, is a style, and well on its way to becoming a traditional martial art, as it is following the exact same path that the traditional martial arts have all followed. One need only watch a UFC anthology to see quite clearly the development of MMA into a style, a style born out of a competition between various traditional martial arts.From this beginning, as martial artists of various backgrounds began to see that they were lacking something, they began to work toward repairing these newfound deficiencies, and thus was born MMA, and it is in a state of evolution to this day.  But it is important to note that the pioneers were not blending styles, they were engaged in the acquisition of new skills, and the two are very different.

If you are studying Krav Maga with the end goal in mind of being able to protect yourself in a physical assault, you could do much worse in your choice of styles, and I suggest that there is very little that you are going to be lacking, aside from possibly some training in the skills of situational awareness avoidance, and de-escalation. I strongly recommend visiting the sites listed in the links section of this site. I cannot speak with any authority on Krav Maga, as I only have the most superficial knowledge of the style.I would, however, also recommend that you pick up a copy of Rory Miller’s “Facing Violence”. Rory has some very deep insights into the subject, and a much better presentation that I can give, as all of his material comes from real life experience. I also recommend Marc MacYoung’s “Taking It To The Street”. This one isn’t about changing a martial style, it is about field stripping your system to make it effective in a violent confrontation. Lastly, I want to strongly recommend that you download and listen to the Iain Abernethy podcast titled “The Martial Map”. It is here. Just right click and select “Save Target As”. Iain does a superb job in detailing how we, as martial artists often fail to see where what we know just doesn’t cross over into other fields of expertise.

In short, this is my response. I would love to go deeper into the subject, but to do so would require me to make many assumptions about who I am talking to, and I am not prepared to do so.

I hope this all came out clear, but if not let me know via comment or email!

Comments Off

Filed under Critical Thinking, Martial Arts

Is Hung Gar a ‘Practical Martial Art’?

I receive a lot of email related to what is published on this blog. I think it is funny that people express themselves so freely in the format of an email, but few people comment on the actual articles themselves in the space provided. But that aside, I did get a few emails covering the same question, and I felt that, as I am completely unashamed and willing to put whatever I think out there for public praise or ridicule, I would answer here on the blog. (It isn’t that don’t care what people think, although that is a part of it, the fact is that I always consider the source. Not all opinions need to be considered…)

The question is this, “Why does the top of the page say, “Practical Martial Arts” when there is a photo of you, surrounded by fire, performing some very impractical techniques from Hung Gar?” For a start, practical is in the eye of the practitioner, but we can save that for a bit, and take this one step at a time.

The fire is there because the me who grew up in the 80’s still likes pictures of stuff surrounded by fire, and it also allows me to make “kung fu in hell” jokes. As for the rest; I am going to take some liberties with the question and change it slightly into the more interesting (at least to me) question of, “Is Hung Gar a ‘Practical Martial Art’?”

Well, in order to answer this properly, we must first define what the word practical means.

When we speak of “practical martial arts” what should come to mind immediately would be a martial art that can be applied against the types of attacks that a person is likely to face in our modern time.

Most martial arts are very capable of dealing with the types of attacks found within the system itself. This is, of course, how it should be. After all, in any training hall around the world, the people you train with the most are going to be students of the same style or system, and therefore should be most used to using and defending against attacks of the type used most by that particular style or system. If the style is not suited to defending against the very techniques it presents to the practitioners, then one must question the system and its validity. (Please don’t try the line that the techniques are so awesome that the style cannot even defend against itself).

There are many reasons that people take up martial arts. If your reason for training includes gaining the ability to protect yourself in a fight, then you need to understand practical application.

The reason I throw in the term practical application, instead of simply saying application is this: if the techniques are not applicable against the techniques that are likely to be used against you, then your style is not practical, and if it is not practical, then it will not serve your purposes of self-defense/self-protection. It may work wonderfully against ninjas falling from the sky, or warrior monks riding on the backs of dragons while eating poppy seed muffins, but is that really practical?

So I will now come back to Hung Gar, and the question, Is Hung Gar a ‘Practical Martial Art’?

The honest answer to this question is going to be the same as if the question were asked about nearly any other martial art.

Hung Gar is practical if it is taught to be used in a practical manner.

When the techniques of Hung Gar are either only drilled in the forms, or are taught as being response to other techniques typical only to Hung Gar or other Southern Chinese martial arts, then no, it is not going to be a practical martial art.

When one trains only the forms, regardless of martial style or system, there is going to be a lack of depth. Even when the student (or in some cases, the instructor) is convinced that they understand the applications of the form, there remains the fact that these applications will remain nothing more than theory, until practiced and drilled repeatedly. And as long as they remain theory, the student will be completely unable to use them in the real world.

Equally misleading is the situation where the trainee is taught applications to the individual techniques that are going to only be used against techniques unique to the style, system, or region and time of origin.

The types of attacks one would be likely to face in 1800 south China are almost certainly different from the types of attacks one is likely to face in an alley in 2012 Chicago. And the odds of being attacked by a Hung Gar practitioner are probably pretty low. I don’t have case studies and hard statistics to back this up, but I am still pretty confident in the statement. Some of the attacks could be similar, or possibly even exact, but the majority probably would not be related at all.

There are several lists out, but the most common list out states 36 habitual attacks. I believe that list is copyrighted, and so do not wish to go too much into that list.

clip_image002[5]As I stated in an earlier article, the common attacks faced are going to be circular kicks or strikes, linear kicks or strikes, tackles and ground-work.

Let us start with the photo from my banner at the left. This is an example I have used before. There are a variety of situations where this technique could be applied.

The lower hand is being used to redirect an incoming technique, and the upper hand is striking/grabbing (it can be practiced in a variety of ways).  The redirect can be trained for use against either linear or circular attacks, given enough practice.

But the real key is just that, practice.

Too often, martial arts instructors and students allow theory to take the place of practice, and this cannot but end poorly. If we allow theory to take the place of actual practice, we end up as those very caricatures of martial artists that we all despise. Every single martial artist on the planet wants to be taken seriously. Those that are the butt of the jokes don’t realize that it is them that are made fun of, and sharply deny it if they are told.

The drills that I use to teach the above technique are pretty standard in the world of practical martial arts. I follow a process where the student will first learn what to do with the hand doing the redirection. This is started from the most elementary levels of a static arm held out in place of a punch. Later, motion is introduced to the set. Next we practice the counter-strike that is executed here with the hand on top. This can be done as a grab of the throat, or as a strike to the throat, or face. In either case, it is important to remember that the key is going to be in practice. You need to practice repeatedly, at each level, and from different angles against an increasingly resistant opponent. Grabs to the throat and strikes to the head are dangerous. Care must be taken to prevent unneeded injury to your training partners. Standard rule of thumb applies. With a partner, work on the speed and precision, and when you work for power, use a heavy bag or a mannequin bag. Eventually, different angles are introduced to make the application three dimensional. There is always an evolution and a process.  image

Next we find (pictured to the right here) a bridging technique called “Subduing Bridge”. The term “subdue” refers to gaining a physical control over the opponent. The best reference I was given on this technique was when Onassis told me to “do it like you are drowning someone”. Since that time, I have never been able to perform this move without having that image pop up into my mind’s eye.

What is probably obvious to most should be the probable application of grabbing an opponent and pressing them downward. The footwork would have to be changed from a standard horse stance to make that work very well, but all of this is discovered in practice. Again, as with everything we train, we start from rudimentary levels and work toward a more free and live” simulation of the technique being used in a self-defense/self-protection situation. When seen as preventing a takedown, and practiced as such, one finds only slight modifications needed to make it workable.

Last I will address the Kiu Sao, or one-finger briclip_image006[4]dge hand, common and seen throughout the Hung Gar systems worldwide. The hand position is quite unusual when you are considering that this is supposed to have a martial or fighting application. To form the one-finger bridge hand position, you start with a tiger claw hand position, and raise the index finger. There are differing ideas on the precise thumb position. There are schools that teach that the thumb should be held close to the palm, others teach that it should be outstretched as far as possible from the hand. As the base for the arguments tends to break down into Qi flow and not actual application, I will say that which way is correct is going to depend entirely on what you are teaching as the application. In either case, in application, I strongly recommend that you do not opt to raise the index finger when practicing practical applications. The technique is intended to be used as a strike or a grab (train it both ways). The first time someone grabs your upraised finger, or strikes it, you will understand why.

In the series of techniques from Gung Ji Fuk Fu Kuen form, from which the above photo is taken, there are some great applications to be found. There are a elbows and redirects, and strikes that flow directly off of the redirecting techniques. Fantastic, wonderful, GREAT stuff. But the bottom line that must be understood – for any martial arts application to be useful, it must be practical. And no matter how practical it may be, if it is not trained, it will be useless.

In closing, I will say that I find Hung Gar to be a practical martial art. It does contain things that are for show and street performance, but there is a lot of value to be had for the practical minded martial artist. My advice for any martial artist of any style or background is the same. Find the practical application, and train it extensively. There is no way you will end up regretting the time it takes to learn how to use your style or system the way it is meant to be used.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

4 Comments

Filed under Critical Thinking, Martial Arts, Practical Application, Training

Overlooked Self-Defense Elements 4: De-Escalation

This is part four of a series of articles where I look at the elements needed for a self-defense or self-protection course to be of real use. In a previous article I listed the required elements as follows:

  • Awareness
  • Avoidance
  • Pre fight indicators (pre-fight rituals)
  • De-escalation
  • Adrenaline effects
  • And last, actual physical skills

De-Escalation

People are truly some strange critters. We have managed at various places and times to convince some people to do some absolutely stupid things.

Over the course of generations, we have also developed some truly fascinating and strange habits that tend to make no sense whatsoever.

We have been dealing with the subject of fighting, so I will stay focused on that.

Men especially, but some women too, have some asinine ideas with regards to our image. Men can say some outrageous things to each other and laugh it off, or throw mild profanities back at the speaker when in the company of men. But say the same things to a man in front of a woman, especially if it is a woman he is attracted to, and you are playing with fire.

Speaking for men, we do not think these things through. We do not say to ourselves, “Hey! That jerk over there is supposed to be my friend. And he just made me look like a tool in front of my soon-to-be girlfriend. I think I need to punch him in the face so she doesn’t think less of me.” When we get mad, there is usually not a lot of chatter going on inside of our skull. We are simply mad. We act, and only places labels and justifications on our actions after the fact. I do not know if this is how it happens for women, and will leave that subject to be addressed by a woman.

The subject of De-escalation, and even the term were not part of anything I studied until very recently. As with the previous articles, I refer you to the Conflict Communications website and refer you to read the book The Little Black Book of Violence.

Except for any personal anecdotes that may turn up, the information contained here came from Iain Abernethy, Lawrence Kane, Marc MacYoung, Rory Miller, and Kris Wilder.  To me, these are the leaders in the field, and as I stated in the last article, I am a student, and a relatively new student at this.

With all of that out-of-the-way, let’s talk about de-escalation!

De-Escalation, speaking specifically is a tactic used when you are in danger of a physical confrontation. There are no set rules and exact parameters to list as “This is a situation where you need de-escalation strategies…” and “This is not…”

Put simply, if you are in danger, you should be able to tell. Go back and look at the pre-fight indicators and have those memorized.

The main point of de-escalation is to defuse the situation before anyone gets hurt. It is important to understand, as well as to teach that in a physical confrontation, most of the time both parties involved come out of it with injuries. By refusing to participate in the game of escalation, we can do our part to see that no one gets hurt. To be clear; de-escalation is not a set of techniques that allow you to restrain an individual while he “clams down” (fat chance of that happening…).

Some of the de-escalation methods might be:

  • Listening
  • Trying to change the focus of the moment
  • Self-Effacing Humor
  • Showing Options

 

De-escalation is going to involve a radical shift for most people. This shift is in going from a position of needing to be right, to listening to the other person. This listening doesn’t mean that you are going to say they are right. But often when you hear a person out they can calm down. With men, the longer you can keep them talking, the more time you place between that adrenalin surge and the end of the situation, the better off you will be. The talking cannot be in the form of the pre-fight stage of posturing. If you keep egging them on, then the doors through which to escape the situation may be closed and locked when you try to use them. Listening as a skill is not what most people think it to be. When the other person is talking and you are judging their words or position, or you are formulating your own response, you are not listening.

Try to keep your communication framed in positive language. For example, “Don’t you see I’m trying to help, you son of a …..” is probably going to be a lot less effective than, “I see what you are saying, so where does this go from here?” You do not have to believe them to make them think that you are on their side and want to help them find a solution.

Look at them while they are speaking, nod frequently or give the intermittent “mmm hmm”. When they stop speaking, use the technique of mirroring. Tell them, “Correct me if I’m wrong, but what you are saying is…” Say back to them what you think they are saying, the point they are trying to make. Use the term, “I understand” even if you don’t mean it.

Pay attention to how both of you are standing. If they are angled with the strong side back, they are prepared to fight. Be sure to keep your hands up and open (both to deflect/redirect an attack as well as to display the universal “I don’t want to fight” message). Remember that movement should be slow, and non-threatening, as should your speaking. Don’t touch them and don’t stand too close. Also, do not stand directly in front of their centerline. Stay slightly toward either side, facing them but at an angle. This is both non-threatening and changes trajectory of their attack into something that takes a slightly longer time to set up.

One often overlooked aspect of de-escalation is to pay attention to your own voice. Yelling is a threat in any culture. Use respect words like “sir” frequently.

The most important thing in terms of de-escalation strategy is one that I pointed out in an earlier article on Avoidance (all of these subjects are inter-related), you don’t have to be declared right. No one has to walk away from the verbal confrontation saying that you were the one with the correct opinion or view or whatever. This is about your personal safety, not your social image or standing.

Changing the focus of the moment is a matter of trying to change their focus from one that is clearly looking for the moment to hit you into one where they see that you are listening and might be on their side of the matter. Anything that can distract (well…not the old “hey, look over there!” line) can be of service.

It is not advised that you use humor unless it is self-effacing humor. Do not be sarcastic, as that is playing the game of escalation. Do not make fun of them, their fighting ability or say anything to provoke, no matter how funny, witty or pithy you feel the comment may be.

And lastly, if you can see the alternatives to fighting, and lay those out for the aggressor, you may be able to get the situation toned down considerably.

Back in 1992, I used to run with some pretty funky people, and it was a crowd I truly did not fit in with. One day one of the girls in the group ran and jumped in my car and said, “Drive!” I drove, and within moments I noticed that we were being followed.

In the folly of my youth, I decided not to run, and I pulled over into the parking lot of the Southwood Movie Theater and got out of the car. The girl ran off and the driver of the other car ran after her. I heard glass break, and turned around.

I didn’t have time to react. As I turned, there was a broken beer bottle pressed against my throat. I held my arms out to the side, hands open. The Bottle holder, a punk named Cooper, told me to give him a reason. I noticed the smell of the beer from the bottle, I noticed that I could feel a liquid running down my neck and calmly wondered if it was beer or blood (it was both), I noticed a group of people standing and watching the entire event. I don’t know how long this all took, but it seemed like a long time. I told Cooper, “There are a lot of people watching, and if you are going to do this, you will get caught. The crowd parted as a Police cruiser drove up. I told Cooper, “Cops.” He looked over his shoulder.

I wish I could say here that with cat-like reflexes and ninja type skill, I disarmed him and broke him into tiny bite sized pieces, but that is not what happened. I still stood there with arms outstretched as Cooper smashed the bottle on the ground and ran like a rabbit. The Police chased him, and caught him.

While this is not the best example of de-escalation, I use it to point out at least NOT escalating the situation. I feel no shame in not trying to disarm him, as he could have opened my throat before I managed to execute the disarming technique that was running through my head.

You don’t have to be declared the winner. That night I got to go home. I think that means I won.

Comments Off

Filed under Critical Thinking, Martial Arts, Self Defense, Self Protection, Uncategorized

Overlooked Self-Defense Elements 3: Pre-Fight Indicators/Pre-Fight Rituals

This is part three of a series of articles where I look at the elements needed for a self defense or self-protection course to be of real use. In a previous article I listed the required elements as follows:

  • Awareness
  • Avoidance
  • Pre fight indicators (pre-fight rituals)
  • De-escalation
  • Adrenaline effects
  • And last, actual physical skills

Pre-fight indicators (pre-fight rituals)

Throughout the world there are a series of easily identified behaviors that serve as pre-fight indicators. I got the terms pre-fight indicators and pre-fight rituals from the Conflict Communications website, and much of the information that follows is from them as well. I in no way intend to pass myself off as an expert in this field of study. I am a student, and a relatively new student to this aspect of self-protection.

The basic idea behind this study is that, cross-culturally, there are some behaviors that can serve as a warning to those who are able to identify them, that a fight is about to occur. One must remember that these rituals are in a very real sense hard-wired into our brain. MacYoung points out that these conflicts scripts are wired into our brain and are designed for the survival of the group, not the individual.

One of the first is usually called posturing. It is a method used by many species in an attempt to seem larger and show dominance. Interestingly, this posturing includes the shouts, loud talking and profanity used before a fight starts. Included also are a puffing of the chest, and in many cases a lowering of the neck and head. The entire process is an attempt to intimidate, and I have read that much of it is unconscious, and not at all planned.

The soon-to-be-attacker may angle their body, both narrowing the target you see, and at the same time, bracing their body to launch or receive an attack.

Another thing that can indicate that things are about to get really bad is when the person is shaking or trembling. This could be fear, but more than likely it is the result of adrenalin. Never assume that they are afraid of you, and even if they are afraid of you, never assume that is a good thing.

The basic outline of a fight follows the same general pattern. There are many variables, but we are speaking in generalities.

  • The Verbal Argument. This is the stage where nothing has happened, and if one of you is in the right mindset, it can be relatively easy to extricate yourself from the situation without it turning physical.
  • Posturing. In this stage, you and the other guy will begin puffing out your chests, talking loudly, and the profanities will probably be getting a thorough use. It can still be possible to get out of the fight, but it is getting harder to do it. One of you has to swallow your pride and back down if there is to be any hope of getting out of the fight at this point.
  • The Man-Kiss and Chest Bumping. I know there is probably a better name for it, but this is what I call it. This is the stage where the two soon to be combatants get right in each other’s face. It really looks like they are about to start kissing. Back when I was in school, two boys were about to get in a fight one day. When they got to this stage, my ever mischievous self started a chant to them of, “Kiss! Kiss! Kiss! Kiss!” Unfortunately, they both turned their attention toward me…There is still some verbal exchange going on. As this is the last (partially) non-physical point of the pre-fight, this is a very tricky stage. The chest bumping will start around this time. And I have seen people trying to back out of the fight at this time and get shoved down as they back away.
  • Shoving. Things are turning physical, and you have missed all of the off ramps. Chances are probably pretty low that you will be able to escape the situation without fighting. You have had several chances prior to this, and if you missed them, your mindset is probably going to be all wrong for getting out of the fight. At this point adrenalin is surging and you are less and less your normal self.

It is very important to know the pre-fight indicators. These should be taught, understood, and drilled until you know them on sight, and can extricate yourself from the potential fight in the earliest possible stages. One thing to keep in mind about this list – it is not written in stone. Much as the boy in the movie A Christmas Story committed a faux pas in skipping to the “triple-dog dare”, your adversary can skip to any point on the list at any time. This is why you need to understand the list, and get out of the situation as quickly as possible. If they jump from verbal to shove, you are in deep. Again, I refer you to the Conflict Communications website, read and re-read.

 

Comments Off

Filed under Critical Thinking, Martial Arts, Self Defense, Self Protection

Hollywood Misconceptions

The scene is in nearly every martial arts movie out there. The martial artist is alone. He isn’t wearing a shirt or shoes, so we know he isn’t on his way to the convenience store. He is training. He assumes the splits, possibly up on chairs or the railing of a balcony. He starts to make strange gesticulations with his hands, with a slow, almost dance type motion. He will contort his fingers into odd positions in an attempt to look cool. Every now and then his gesticulations are interrupted by a punch, leaving the image that most of what he is practicing are the hand positions and arm motions. The punches themselves seem to be the afterthought.

Exactly why this scene is played out in so many movies remains unclear to me. My guess is that it is supposed to add to the aura of mysticism that is supposed to be a main feature of the martial arts. To me, it just looks silly. But, the image is there, and I have known many martial artists who go through the ritual, completely ignoring the fact that it just makes them look like a doofus.

In the eyes of someone who only knows martial artists from what they see in movies, we must seem pretty silly. The typical martial artist in the movies has his head in the clouds. He can spout ancient wisdom at will. He has secret, super-powers, but he doesn’t want to use them until his loved ones are killed or maimed (never to stop the nefarious acts from happening in the first place). When he is brought to the point of action, he first goes off somewhere alone, to go through some version of the aforementioned ritual. After the ritual is complete, he fights the bad guy, often killing him by accident after beating him well beyond the point that a normal person could survive, and taking a much worse beating from the bad guy. He never seems to go to jail for these crimes either, so one must assume that the people who form Grand Juries wherever our hero lives must be very understanding people.

For a long time I never gave the stereotype much thought. Only after years of following the nonsense did I start to notice the problem.

The problem has nothing to do with spoiling our image. It has more to do with the real world, and who is watching and imitating the Hollywood myth.  

Children watch our heroes aided by wires, trampolines, and special effects, and attempt to imitate what they see. In the eyes of a child, the thought that simply punching another person, and they die from falling and hitting their head on something just doesn’t seem possible. The idea that getting shot in the stomach and waking up in a hospital bed with a colostomy bag hanging off of their abdomen is completely foreign. The very real possibility that they could be sent to prison for a very long time for killing someone “in self-defense” never enters their head. All of this is because Hollywood does not show this. Hollywood produces films to entertain, not inform, and adults know this. But the kids don’t make this connection.

So, what is a real martial arts master like? Well, for me the discussion is simple, I don’t believe in martial arts masters, so that is where it all ends. But let’s change the word from master to expert. What is a real world martial arts expert going to be like?

While I am dying to take the easy road and start this with a list of what he or she is not going to be like, I am going to resist the temptation. Here is my list:

Knowledgeable. A martial arts expert is going to be knowledgeable. They are going to have a deep, thorough, and ever-increasing understanding of their style, its history and development, applications and meanings. A true expert is not going to have merely a superficial knowledge of any aspect of their art. To be a true expert in anything, this is surely a given.

Curiosity. The true expert is never going to reach a point where they are satisfied with their current state of knowledge. Every level of training comes with the understanding that there is still more yet to be discovered. An expert never thinks they have all of the answers, they know this because they do not have answers to all of their own questions. There is a certain sense of a childlike wonder I have found to be a common trait among those people I would classify as Experts in the martial arts. It is especially interesting when this childlike wonder has not diminished even in those who have trained in the martial arts for thirty or more years.

Physically fit. A true expert in the martial arts should be wise and disciplined enough to be the very essence of physical fitness. All too often, a person reaches black belt rank, and their waist size balloons. Mine did. I think is comes about because of the transfer most people make from earning black belt to teaching martial arts. Once you start teaching, it is very easy to begin calling the classes you teach “training sessions”, and overlook the fact that it was not you doing the training. I fell into this trap more than once. As part of the ongoing quest for “mastery”, we would all do well to remember that teaching is not training, and that our own training should hold more importance to us that our teaching. Eating right and exercising are self-defense.

Unassuming. I had quite a debate going on with myself as to which word I wanted to use here. I had originally chosen “humble”, but that word has been beat to death by Hollywood, so I opted for something used a lot less frequently. An expert in any field is usually going to be quite open about what they know, but they are also going to know how much is left that they have not even begun to understand. When a “master” boasts about what they know, and market and present themselves as if they are the only person on earth that knows what they know, it goes against all reason. At this writing, I have trained in the martial arts for 28 years. To some people, that may seem like quite a long time. But the fact is that many of the people I know have been training in the martial arts for much longer. Thirty and forty-year martial artists are not that rare.

With all that there is to be studied and all that there is to learn and practice, there is more than a lifetime of engaging study to be had. Not one person will ever master it all, or know it all or see it all. If that is not humbling, nothing ever will be.

And last on the list, to the martial arts expert, it is a way of life. To the expert martial artist, this is not something we do. It is who we are. The training permeates every aspect of our lives. We don’t stop being a martial artist when we close up the Dojo and go home. It is who we are.

There is my list. Please notice; there are no magical powers listed. For the record and to the bemusement of my critics, I do not meet all of the qualifications I have listed. So, no I didn’t just put this together to be able to define master as expert and then qualify myself as an expert, and therefore a master. I am no such thing.

Comments Off

Filed under Critical Thinking, Martial Arts

We Sharpen Saws: An essay on the truth of self defense classes

In the mid 90s, I had a martial arts club that was doing well enough that I was able to move out of the rec center where we were holding classes and into a storefront space. Like anyone starting out, I had little money, and more ideas than I could ever hope to bring to reality. I didn’t know where to start with everything. Once I leased the space, I decided I needed business cards. I don’t know why I thought business cards were such a priority, but at the time it seemed more important than other forms of advertising. So, I went to a local print shop and ordered my first set of business cards.

Waiting for them to arrive was difficult, as I was more than a little excited about my new school. When they were printed, I went to pick them up, and my excitement faded fast. Right there on my brand new business cards:

 

Smedley Martial Arts

Hung Gar Kung Fu

Group Classes – Private Instruction

“We Sharpen Saws”

 

 Yes. Right there…”We Sharpen Saws”.

They offered to print a new set when I pointed out the error. But they also made an offer that the eternally cash strapped me could not turn down, I could take the cards with the error for half price.

So that was how I ended up handing out cards all over Austin offering martial arts instruction and joking about how I don’t really sharpen saws. The business cards were brought up to me in conversation by a student from that time when we ended up in a conversation about false advertising. He joked about how if I handed those out now, someone would file a lawsuit against me for false advertising.

How many martial arts instructors actually take the time to study and see if what they are claiming to offer is truly what they provide?

One easy example is the claim of “Self Defense Classes”.

In the traditional martial arts there are many different views as to what is the best method of self-defense. One will find entire schools and systems dedicated to one small aspect of fighting and laying claim to that system or school’s supremacy in the world of self-defense.

But one must ask which school or method is correct? Obviously, they cannot all be correct, as they are all claiming superiority.

In order to come close to answering this question, we must first determine what self-defense really is.

Speaking in specificity, self-defense is a very narrowly defined legal term. Throughout the world, there are different interpretations of the term, but what is clear is this; most of what is taught as “self-defense” in the United States is in legal terms, assault. What most people are looking for in a “self-defense” class is training in self-protection.

Throughout the USA, there are seminars and classes taught every day on the subject of self-defense. In the vast majority of these classes, the students are taught a specific response to a specific attack. Those who choose the path of the traditional martial arts will have a longer road, but the same outline when it comes to their method of self-defense; attack A requires response B.

Violence comes in so many different varieties and levels of intensity that there is no way that any rational person should ever be duped into believing that this attack/response scenario is even remotely workable in the real world.

Let us take a moment to examine what we should know when it comes to self-defense.

The most glossed over, least taught, and grossly unexamined aspect of self-defense is also the most important: Awareness.

Through practice in simply being aware of your surroundings and your environment, you will be able to avoid most “self-defense” situations in the first place.

But, if this is the most important aspect of self-defense training, why is it not taught?

The answer is simple, there is little to no market for it.

When a martial arts school offers self-defense classes as a sideline business, they need to make money off of it or they will not continue to teach it. When people sign up for a self-defense class, they have the attack/response training in mind before they sign up. If they do not get what they think they wanted, then word will spread that “Southside Dojo’s Self Defense training is worthless! He just tells you to keep your eyes open for any trouble…”

Just as important, and every bit as ignored, is training in avoidance. For those few situations where you didn’t see the trouble coming, simple strategies in the field of avoidance and de-escalation will carry you through. If you have any clue that they are available.

But as was the case with awareness, there isn’t a big market for avoidance and de-escalation strategies. Marc MacYoung is one of the best teachers in the world in this field, but he has not yet gotten rich through teaching it.

The duality of martial arts “philosophy” and “self-defense” training is largely unexamined. We martial artists hold firmly that we are not looking for a fight; we are peaceful warriors, and so on. Yet we are taught and we teach that if someone grabs your wrist, you need to twist and lock the attacker’s wrist, destroy the knee joint with a kick, snake the arm around their neck and with a sharp snap, break their neck, thus ending their life of wrist grabbing crime. 

This is more than confusing, it is dangerous. In the real world, if someone attacks you, even if they have a weapon, there is a fine line between self-defense and assault. Much of what is taught as self-defense by self-professed experts will be classified as assault by the police in nearly every area of the U.S. Yet this excessive use of force is what is taught and drilled repeatedly in martial arts schools across the country every single day.

Even worse than this is the fact that most of these “experts” have little to no experience in real world violence. Their exposure is limited to what they see on TV and in the movies. One fact that you should never lose sight of is this – movies and TV shows are not even close to accurate depictions of real violence. Soldiers, Police, Corrections officers, and criminals can tell you about real violence. Mr. Black Belt over at any-town Dojo does not have the real world experience, unless he worked in one of the previously listed professions, to teach you anything about violence. In my admittedly limited experience, I can only tell you that real violence is fast, ugly, very scary, and very messy. Nothing you do in the Dojo will prepare you for what is out there.

So, what good are self-defense courses and classes?

They are good for a confidence boost. I hold the opinion that anything that gets people off of their butt and moving around cannot be all bad. However, when you sell people something under the term of self-defense, and it is really something that could place them directly in jail should they ever follow your teachings; I have serious issues with that.

Critical thinking has a very crucial role in the martial arts and self-defense. It is a very common occurrence in martial arts schools around the world that the students check their intellectual freedom at the door. The instructor’s word is law, and this law must be followed. The teachings must be accepted, even when they have no basis in fact.

This becomes especially dangerous when we tread into the field of study of self-defense. Most people, when asked, will claim that they are not, in fact, giving up their intellectual freedom, they are following the teachings of an expert.

This brings us right back to where we left off. How do you define an expert in self-defense? Is it going to be someone who has survived thousands of drunken bar fights? Someone who has to fight through muggers, rapists and ninjas on their way home from work every day? How does one become an expert in self-defense? Do you really become an expert in self-defense through training in a dojo?

Typically, the answer is a resounding “NO” you do not become an expert in self-defense training in your typical dojo.

To truly gain real world self-defense skills and self-protection skills, you will need to train against more than a wrist grab. At the very least, you need to study the following:

  • Awareness
  • Avoidance
  • Pre fight indicators (pre-fight rituals)
  • De-escalation
  • Adrenalin effects
  • And last, actual physical skills

Please note that it is only the last skill in which you will receive any training during the typical self-defense seminar.   

Bottom line: Before you place your trust in the hands of an instructor, be armed with the power to critically examine what you are taught. Critical thinkers do not take someone’s word for it on any subject. We are interested in fact, and want to know the truth. The truth may not be what we like, or wanted to hear, but it is always better to be armed with the facts.

For more information on this topic, go to my links page and check some of the websites listed.

1 Comment

Filed under Critical Thinking, Martial Arts, Training

Pseudoscience and Drama…

                Okay, the time has come once again to address some very strange claims made by a couple of people involved in the Chinese Martial Arts. Before we begin, I would ask you to watch this video:

                From the opening line, “It is called Qigong…” this is all about drama. There is very little in the entire video that has anything to do with real issues or a close and unbiased examination of facts. The line claims, “science will attempt to reveal the truth” is quaint, but when the facts are in your face and you ignore them in favor of drama, then you are not going to be taken seriously.

                The fact is, I would not even take this clip seriously enough to write about it except for one problem – a student sent me the clip wanting to know if I would be willing to teach them “Iron Shirt Qigong”.

                So when there is a student taking this garbage seriously enough that they actually want to learn it, we have a problem.

                Take another look at the swing taken on the crash test dummy at the 1:59 point of the video. One can clearly see that the strike was intended to achieve maximum impact. The strike goes well into the chest of the dummy and there is a false recoil made by the person swinging the bat after it had already bounced free from the dummy. This is important later.

                When we take a look at the strike on the “monk” at the 3:43 mark, we can clearly see that the strike was pulled. The recoil happens almost on impact. There was a strike, as is evidenced by the red mark, but I have to let my inner skeptic out and ask, why did they allow the strike to be performed by the “monk’s” student. Why not A-Rod? Why not any pro baseball player? If Qigong does protect, what would there be to fear from a strike from anyone. Let me take a swing at him!

                The spear is very impressive to the uninitiated, but it is an ancient parlor trick where the pressure is not going straight in but rather, down. They make passing reference to the redness on his chest below where the spear tip was but fail follow up on why it should be red, and exactly how much pressure was applied there to cause the redness.

                Sorry kids, this is one for the crackpot file. Nothing special here, just some pseudoscience and a heavy dose of drama.  

Comments Off

January 19, 2012 · 9:52 am